"...an utterly corrupt new religion called environmentalism..."
If the history of this planet's climate over millions of years is any guide, we are about to enter a new ice age.
CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper indicated in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune that he wants to see the United States become a Muslim country.
Judicial Activism No Better From the Right
By Trevor Bothwell (12/03/05)
A few weeks ago, Townhall.com blogger Laura Hollis shared a suggestion most parents should heed: Get your children out of government schools.
Ms. Hollis was upset over a recent decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that parents "have no constitutional right ... to prevent a public school from providing its students with whatever information it wishes to provide, sexual or otherwise, when and as the school determines that it is appropriate to do so."
So what prompted parents to sue the Palmdale School District in California? According to Hollis:
In Fields v. Palmdale School District, parents sued after discovering that their primary school-aged children had been administered a questionnaire that asked them, amongst other things, how frequently they had, "touched their private parts too much," "thought about having sex" or "thought about touching other peopleās private parts."
I don't know about you, but if my nine-year-old was given a survey of this nature in school, I'd probably be doing a little "touching" of my own -- and it would probably involve the neck of the principal or curriculum supervisor who authorized such inappropriate trash. But while this episode absolutely disgusts me, I believe that the court actually got this one right.
I know, I know. This is also the court that ruled absurdly that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional. But even if this ruling was fueled more by the judges' collective desire to allow this type of behavior in our public schools than it was to respect the scope of the Constitution, it nevertheless remains that there is nothing in the Constitution discussing who is allowed to teach our children about sex and how it must be done.
Public school overreaches like this little sex survey are maddening to most people who at least want to protect what little innocence our kids are allowed to retain anymore. But while I gather that Ms. Hollis would have preferred to see the court rule in favor of the plaintiffs, her suggestion to vote with our feet and remove our kids from such draconian environments altogether is the true solution to public school insanity.
This type of hypersexualization has been a mainstay in public schools for years now. The books Daddy's Roommate and Heather Has Two Mommies, which seek to convince impressionable tykes of the virtues of homosexuality, have been required reading in many first- and second-grade classrooms around the country for over a decade.
In other words, we're never going to be totally happy with everything our public schools teach -- just like some people aren't happy they can't shout in libraries, though the rule prohibiting such behavior is hardly an abrogation of the right to free speech or equal protection.
What we should do to combat public nuisances is raise the issues in the court of public opinion -- by starting grassroots organizations protesting such misuse of our tax dollars; by holding town hall meetings to garner support for our positions; and by raising awareness in the press and debating elected officials -- or even better, voting said representatives out of office when they don't conform to our demands. The problem, however, is that public schools are statist by their very nature. And too often many of us simply are being outworked by those on the Left who endorse the socialist underpinnings of our schools.
Judicial activism tends to occur predominantly from the left, but it's no better or more appropriate from the right. Decisions that flout the Constitution find us no better off as a society just because we happen to prefer the outcome. Have we ever stopped to think that perhaps the reason our judiciary seems to exert so much domain over us is because it's often the first branch of government to which we turn to solve problems we should be solving ourselves?
Effecting democratic social change takes time, and if parents don't like their kids' public schools they have every right to yank them out and homeschool them, send them to private or parochial schools, or advocate on behalf of school choice programs, all of which would most significantly reign in so much of this public school idiocy in the first place.
It's important to protect our children. But if we don't protect the Constitution, there's only so much we'll be able to do for them anyhow. In the end, the power to influence our kids resides in us, not the courts.
Original: http://www.democracy-project.com/archives/002052.html
Ā©2005 Trevor Bothwell
(Printer friendly version) Email: Trevor Bothwell
Trevor Bothwell is a freelance writer living in Maryland. He is a contributing writer at Democracy Project (www.democracy-project.com). He is a graduate of the State University of New York (SUNY) at Geneseo. He holds a bachelor's degree in elementary education and a master's degree in reading education, both from Geneseo. Trevor released his first book in December 2001, a cookbook titled "50 Ways to Impress Your Girlfriend's Parents" (Silver Hammer Press). Trevor currently spends his spare time promoting his book and cooking way too often for his wife, Amie. They live in southern Maryland.
Send Feedback To Trevor Bothwell
Site:
UPSSA
United Progressive Socialist States of America
|
"Mexico, Canada partnership underway with no authorization from Congress"
The United States Is Being Overthrown By Our Politicians - "A silent but all-reaching coup is taking place within the
United States. This coup is not being directed by bomb-laden Muslim terrorists, nor will it ever be covered by the mainstream media.
The seditious act is being carried out by our very own elected officials, with President Bush leading the insurrection."
"The FDA has conveniently used the excuse of looking out for consumer safety to increase their perverse regulatory power,
undermine free speech, disrupt commerce, and generally get in the way of helping people improve their health. The "half-truth" of
the safety issue is used as a ploy to reduce the rights of Americans, one freedom at a time. Once again, the FDA is seeking more
police power to intimidate supplement companies. This is one step in an overall FDA master plan to eliminate therapeutic nutritional
supplements from the free market. Those who lose are the American public." The FDA - A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
|
|
