Going too far in the Senate and falling short in the Church
By J. James Estrada (01/24/06)
Confucius say: 'To go too far is as bad as to fall short.' Democrats may want to dust off the old wisdom quote book and learn from the masters. Of course, in DemLand, the masters are Bill Clinton and Michael Moore. Talk about falling short.
So who’s going too far on the Left? How about Harry Reid? He calls Samuel Alito a threat to the delicate Check & Balances effect the Supreme Court has traditionally had on the Executive. What? Aren’t Supreme Court justices appointed by the Executive? Since when does a President (knowingly) appoint someone that represents his opponent’s position more closely than his own?
Senator Reid also has taken to calling George W. Bush, “King George.” This is to bring focus to the Dem’s ire that Bush has authorized electronic surveillance of terrorists without a legal imperative to do so. Right. Like the legal imperative to steal people’s homes in the recent ‘eminent domain’ ruling? Legal doesn’t mean “right” and “right” isn’t always legal.
It is legal in America to kill a baby in the womb. It’s not right. It is “right” to allow people of faith to gather in front of abortion labs to protest and, perhaps, persuade someone not to participate in the practice, but, it’s not legal.
More going “too far”? How about Mrs. Clinton pandering in an all black church on Martin Luther King Day?
That’s bad enough, but how about the faithful falling for that nonsense with their applause? Where is the man of God in that church? He actually allowed that filth to come from his pulpit? Did Mrs. Clinton compare the Republican-lead House of Representatives to a “plantation” before or after worship?
Are black churches in Harlem “Christian” or “Democrat”? While Reid and Clinton go too far, the black church, I’m afraid, falls short.
Copyright 2006 J. James Estrada
(Printer friendly version) Email: J. James Estrada
