AD: The Four Wars of Iraq - The Northern Ireland Connection - Arthur Bruzzone

The Four Wars of Iraq - The Northern Ireland Connection
By Arthur Bruzzone (12/27/06)

SAN FRANCISCO, Ca -- There have been four wars fought in Iraq since 2003.
Each has a paradigm and historical precedence. The U.S. and coalition Forces
have won the first three wars in Iraq. For the fourth -- the current phase
of sectarian conflict between Sunnis and Shiites --- the 85 year conflict
between Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland may serve as a model
and a roadmap to resolution. More about that later.

In the first war, the goal was the capture of Baghdad. Coalition forces
initiated a 21st century blitzkrieg, (lightening war) --an offensive
operational-level military strategy that begins an initial bombardment
followed by mobile forces attacking with speed and surprise to prevent an
enemy from organizing a coherent defense. The blitzkrieg tactic was used by
both the Axis and Allies in World War Two, and later by Israel. The U.S.
accelerated the pace of forward advance, appropriately named "Shock and Awe.
Arial bombing --- 1700 air sorties, 504 using cruise missiles --targeted
Iraqi communications, air defenses, and planning facilities. The bombings
were also intended to demoralize enemy defense forces. The strategy worked.
In two weeks, the U.S. entered Baghdad. The first war was a success.

The goal of the second war was the capture of Saddam Hussein. In tactics and
strategy, this phase of the war resembled the 1989 invasion of Panama that
brought down the Panamanian military leader Manuel Noriega. Like Saddam
Hussein, Noreiga was a brash dictator overseeing assets critical to the
U.S.-the Panama Canal. Noriega threatened the neutrality of the Panama
Canal. Panama had also become a center for drug money laundering and a
transit point for drug trafficking to the U.S. and Europe. The capture of
Noriega took less time in the small country of Panama - thirty-five days
from the start of the invasion. It took nine months to find Saddam Hussein
who was captured by U.S. forces on December 13, 2003. Later, he was
convicted of crimes against humanity by the Iraq Special Tribunal and
sentenced to death by hanging. Mission Accomplished. We won the second war
of Iraq.

The third war centered on battling non-sectarian insurgency, including
imported insurgents, and instituting democratic-elected government. It's
clear now that Saddam, long an admirer of Stalin, envisioned a Stalingrad
counter attack strategy. Documents found by coalition forces confirm this
including a memo from the director of Iraqi Intelligence, the Mukhabarat,
from February 2003. These contained instructions to senior regime and
intelligence officials in anticipation of a U.S. invasion.

Another key memo discovered by Coalition force featured a long list of
jihadists who had been brought to Iraq before the war. This document
indicated that "hundreds and hundreds" of fighters had come from several
countries in the region including Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Sudan and Syria
prior to the war. The strategy called for organized resistance which
included the classic pattern of forming cells and training combatants in
insurgency. 'Operatives' were to engage in 'sabotage and looting.' Random
sniper attacks and ambushes were to be organized.

The insurgency was composed of at least a dozen major guerrilla
organizations and perhaps as many as 40 distinct groups. This phase of the
war ended On June 8th, 2006, Iraqi officials confirmed that Abu Musab
al-Zarqawi was killed by two 500lb laser guided bombs dropped from an F-16.
At the time of Zarqawi's death, the non-sectarian insurgency was so badly
weakened that he was working to draw Iran into the war based on a document
found in Zarqawi's safe house. Despite the effort of these insurgents, 76%
of registered voters participated in national elections. The Iraqi
government is now considered a legitimate government. We won the third
phase of the war, establishing a democratically elected government.

The fourth war began in April 2003 with the bombing at Imam Ali Mosque in
Najaf that killed 125 Shi'a and Muhammed Baqir al-Hakim. This was the first
major mosque bombing attributable to sectarian strife. Sectarian violence
has continued to the present with mosques still targeted as in 2005, where a
series of bombings killed 74 Shia worshippers and injuring 75 at two
mosques. In addition, hundreds of killings of Sunnis and Shites have marked
this period. And this brings us to the present.

We can now turn to the decades old conflict in Northern Ireland between
Protestants and Catholics to see possible outcomes for the current situation
in Iraq.

In Northern Ireland, many International leaders have attempted to create an
effective coalition government and end the violence. But disarming the
combatants has proved the most difficult challenge. That will also be the
case in Iraq. The first step, like in Northern Ireland, will be to create a
neutral international monitoring commission to oversee disarmament. And as
the Republic of Ireland was brought into talks for settling the conflict in
Northern Ireland, the U.S. must accept that neighboring countries
surrounding Iraq must have a stake any final settlement for an independent
and united Iraq.

Next, the British have consistently used the threat of remaining in Northern
Ireland to prod the warring parties to negotiate. Despite implementing
democratic reforms in Iraq, the U.S. and coalition forces are viewed by
majority of Iraqis as an occupying Western force. Redeployment of U.S. and
coalition forces out of Iraq can be a useful negotiating tool. Finally,
like in Northern Ireland, a precondition for a working settlement, must be
an Iraqi homeland security apparatus that is trusted. This is precisely the
current policy of the Bush Administration. Namely, to establish an Iraqi
army and police force that can maintain the peace, and make redeployment of
U.S. forces possible.

With a successful resolution of the current war in Iraq, what will have been
achieved: First, a working model for co-existence between warring factions
of Islam, and the strengthening of moderate Moslems in Iraq (the majority)
and around the world. Second, valuable military experience in countering
militant insurgencies. Third, the groundwork for an eventual working
agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. Fourth, preventing Iraq from
becoming an base camp and active supporter of Al Qaida terrorist efforts.
Fifth, building a potential economic powerhouse in the Middle East and major
supplier of oil to the U.S. and Europe (while we develop alternative energy
sources for our cars, boats, homes and industries.)

And finally, ending the rule of Saddam Hussein, who started two major wars
in the Middle East costing over a million lives, and who was active in
supporting attacks on the U.S., and who was an arrogant and cold-blooded
mass murderer. In other words, considering the deadly and demonstrated
behavior of Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein, the U.S. and the world will be
safer without him and his Iraq.

(Printer friendly version) Email: Arthur Bruzzone



	Design � 2003-2008 American Daily. Content �2003-2008 of its respective author. Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. *Views are those of individual authors and not necessarily those of American Daily. Powered by Nucleus CMS Copyright �2005-2008 MoveOff,LLC	We use StatCounter