Why Fred Thompson's Day Has Arrived
By Christopher Adamo (04/05/07)
It is altogether unfortunate that even now, in early 2007, so much focus and
attention is being directed at the 2008 presidential election. America's
policy making apparatus would be better served, were the Democrats who
constitute the Congressional "ruling class" more concerned with the
well-being of the nation, and not so fixated on their noxious pursuit of
political power.
Nevertheless, much of the nation’s direction in coming years will be
determined by next year’s elections. But a convergence of forces from both
sides of the political aisle bodes particularly ill for Republican
prospects. While outwardly “bipartisan “ in nature, it is reflective of a
pervasive liberal mindset.
Something needs to decidedly change, or else the currently disastrous
political tack of the Democrats may be solidified as a harbinger of America’
s future, for however long the nation can endure under such gross
misdirection.
Throughout 2006, Republican compromise and capitulation to the big-spending,
morally bankrupt agenda of the Democrats left the public largely
disillusioned and demoralized. And that public sentiment was clearly
reflected in the upheaval of the midterm elections, which shifted the
country decidedly into the dominion of the Democrats.
Yet the GOP hardly recognized the lesson of last November, and instead has
all too frequently appeared to concede to the guiding philosophies of the
political left. While Americans grow increasingly outraged by the Democrats’
“cut and run” response to an ever encroaching Islamist malignancy,
Republican reaction to the elections have, until recently, been excessively
conciliatory and accommodating.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had initially been heralded in glowing terms, by
everyone from the most junior House members to the President. As a result,
her audacity and that of her cohorts has mushroomed. She now dares to
collaborate with America’s enemies during an ill-advised Middle East junket.
Meanwhile, discussions of “bipartisanship” and “doing the peoples’ business”
within the Congress (which translates as “spending money”) only serve to
bolster the impression that things do go better with Democrats in charge.
Moreover, Republican refusal to pursue rampant Democrat scandal and
corruption lends credence to the notion that such malfeasance only occurs
within the GOP. Clearly, the message of conservatism has been blurred.
Major Republican players such as former House Majority leader Dick Armey
have sought to expunge conservative and Christian principle from the party,
claiming that it is too polarizing. Bob Dole’s “big tent,” a perversion of
Ronald Reagan’s winning concept of bolstering the ranks through
inspirational leadership, is once again being floated as a means of
“broadening the base,” by claiming devotion to every disparate interest
group.
Oblivious to the fact that a watered-down party platform, which largely
sidesteps true conservatism, is the primary reason for the GOP’s poor
showing last November, party “moderates” (read: unprincipled liberals)
strain to the left. Though by doing so they will neither garner Democrat
support, nor will they re-ignite any enthusiasm among the conservatives who
abandoned them last year.
The current lineup of Republican “frontrunners,” led presently by former New
York Mayor Rudy Guiliani, epitomizes this mindset. But far from being a
winning strategy, it is a recipe for disaster.
In an interview with Barbara Walters just this past week, Guiliani gave an
ominous indication of just how his campaign will eventually implode at the
hands of the Democrats and the liberal media. When asked about his wife’s
involvement in his administration, he stated that, among other things, she
would be in attendance at his cabinet meetings.
Once word of this got out, and was portrayed as a possible repeat of Bill
and Hillary’s “co-presidency,” Guiliani backtracked, claiming that, as First
Lady, his wife would pursue her own interests, dealing primarily with health
and fitness. Clearly, neither his first assertion nor the subsequent
disclaimer represented any heartfelt conviction, but instead resulted from
blundered attempts at posturing and pandering.
In like manner, the lone effort by which he has attempted to woo
conservatives amounts to a promise to appoint “originalist” judges to the
Supreme Court. Yet he previously lauded ultra-liberal Clinton appointee Ruth
Ginsburg in glowing terms. One need only consider this in light of his
current incongruous behavior and its potentially dire ramifications, to
understand why Rudy’s assurances on the judicial issue hold no weight with
the conservative base.
Nevertheless, the “moderates” press forward, believing that a Guiliani
victory would garner the power they desire, while ultimately neutralizing
the annoying influence of the “religious right.” By the time that the
consummate pragmatists who concocted this ill-begotten strategy realize that
it cannot succeed, Hillary may well be holding up her right hand and
swearing to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States, so
help her whoever.
Enter the former Republican Senator from Tennessee. By the mere suggestion
that he might consider running for President, Fred Thompson has completely
upset the GOP pragmatists’ apple cart. Without even campaigning, he is
presently polling far beyond conservative pretender Mitt Romney. And he is
coming on strong against McCain and Guiliani. In an effort to stave off
Thompson’s momentum, Guiliani has been compelled to start running ads on
conservative talk-radio programs.
Yet Thompson holds several advantages over any of his early-bird
competitors. With the exception of his previous support for campaign finance
“reform,” he has staunchly upheld the conservative/pro-constitution
philosophy. Thus, he is not burdened by any pile of liberal baggage from
which he must extricate himself. He need not attempt to downplay or recast
his past, but instead he can extol it as proof of his long-standing
conservatism.
Although he has not yet formally announced, all signs point in that
direction. Columnist Robert Novak, in an April 3, 2007 article, assures us
that Thompson does indeed intend to run.
So, with mainstream America expectantly awaiting the entrance of a true
Reaganite candidate into the presently wanting field of Republican
presidential hopefuls, Thompson’s best bet is to simply be himself, and make
no apologies for standing as firmly as he has. In fact, he should accept
every attack on his conservative beliefs as an opportunity to reassert his
devotion to them.
By so doing, he could take the White House with an enthusiastic mandate from
the grassroots. Furthermore, once in office he would be in an ideal position
to re-establish the boundaries of conservatism and liberalism with
sufficient clarity to drive the left into full retreat.
Hope has arrived in the 2008 race for the White House.
(Printer friendly version) Email: Christopher Adamo
