SCOOP: Next-Generation Feminist WMD - Sex Trafficking and Off-Budget Lock-Box Federal Entitlements
By David R. Usher (06/29/07)
Those of us who have been around for a while know that feminists used false child abuse allegations for many years during the 1970's and 1980's to loosen up federal entitlements -- which were largely misused for political payola and false advertising pretending that husbands are the most dangerous illegal aliens in the universe.
The McMartin, Fells Acres, and Little Rascals Day Care false child abuse cases ruined this game for feminists. Subsequently, in the late 1980’s, feminists began using false allegations of domestic violence as their WMD of choice. The work of RADAR and many other organizations in the past three years has revealed the truths to all: women are just as likely to be violent as men in marriage. The Duke Lacrosse case is the backdraft explosion heard all across America, spelling the beginning of the end of the feminist “domestic violence” con game.
Feminists have known for a couple of years that their days of unrestrained hegemony in America and Europe are coming to an end. Britain is reforming child support and social welfare laws, paying little attention to what feminists want. Sweden is beginning to walk away from feminism. In America, feminism has a bad name, and many writers are talking about these “women who made the world worse”. Politicians are realizing that the war on marriage is a bad thing, which is costing them their political careers. One by one, nations have realized that marriage naturally accomplishes what no amount of funding or harsh criminal laws can do: create a civil society in which men and women live cooperatively, and raise the next generation ready to take over.
So, feminists have invented the prototype for their new weapon of mass destruction. It is built and partially functional.
Like Al Qaeda, feminists are now working to make their operations international, portable, inscrutable, distributed, and untouchable. They know they can no longer fool all the countries all of the time – so they will fool as many countries as they can some of the time.
The first piece of weaponry feminists planted in America was the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act (IMBRA). IMBRA established in federal law the outrageous notion that most men interested in marrying foreign women were doing so to use them as sex slaves or unpaid housemaids. While things like this do happen in America, it is usually done by criminal enterprises who do not use introduction agencies to acquire women for trafficking. IMBRA makes it all but impossible for foreign women to meet American men – thus satisfying the fears of American feminists who cannot stand competition from foreign women who truly understand the value of having a husband and prefer marital harmony to institutional bedlam.
But IMBRA is just a taste of a world-class weapon feminists are building furiously in their enclaves while you read this article.
NEWS SCOOP #1: Feminists (operating under the name of the “Congressional Crime Victims Rights Caucus” will soon be introducing “VOCA lock-box legislation”, intended to take feminist federal funding under the Victims Of Crime Act off the federal budget. Once this is accomplished, the presidential line-item veto cannot be used. It would require a congressional supermajority to use the funds for anything not expressly authorized by federal code. In short, it would establish an automated, off budget entitlement to the National Organization of Women and its tentacles, who given the fact that Congress never audits women’s programs, could do just about anything they want with the money.
NEWS SCOOP #2: “International Sex Trafficking” is the new feminist extortion mechanism. It is founded on the notion that huge numbers of women are being transported around the globe as sex slaves and unpaid marriage-entrapped housemaids.
While sex trafficking does happen in relatively small numbers in America, the size of the problem is tremendously smaller than feminists purport it to be. For example, Feminists claimed that 40,000 women would be trafficked to Germany for the 2006 World Cup Finals. Despite massive expenditures, police found a mere five cases.
Those who think global warming is exaggerated have not come close to beating feminist records – who in this case fooled everyone into thinking that the sex trafficking problem is 8,000 times bigger that it really is. Interestingly, feminists strongly support prostitution as a fundamental “women’s rights” issue – which in the traditional Panus-faced feminist style -- is now being reinvented as “sex trafficking” to loosen up all those federal (and international) dollars.
The new roadside IED’s are working for feminiists in the short run. But since we are much smarter than we used to be, we have figured out their game before substantial damage has been wreaked around the world. We must stop this initiative before feminists achieve their goal – which is to create an independently-entitled U.N. agency, financed by large sums of “off budget” federal entitlements that cannot be touched even by presidential line-item veto.
At the same time, U.N. feminists are pressing hard for the creation of a single women’s agency at the United Nations, which would be funded separately from the general contributions that member nations provide to the United Nations. Early this year feminists tried and failed to talk Congress into providing direct entitlements to feminists NGO’s at the United Nations. They have most certainly not given up. Once a free-wheeling radical feminist enterprise is established operating under the guise of the “United Nations”, they will be back demanding off-budget permanent entitlements from Congress.
All organizations and individuals who, for various reasons oppose the agenda of the National Organization for Women, must rise to this occasion to defeat the largest and sneakiest terrorist organization in the world. VOCA lock-box legislation must not even be introduced in Congress. VAWA must be reformed, and federal investigations must be launched to study how federal policy drove the Duke case, and to more fully understand the tremendous damage done to marriage by VAWA.
David R. Usher
(Printer friendly version) Email: David R. Usher
