'Chipping or Sea Changes?'
By John A. Ross (07/29/08)
Despite their denials the ACLU, American Civil Liberties Union, was formed by a small group of Communist Party of America members to undermine our freedoms and promote communism. Pursuant to these devious goals, legal “tests” are used to challenge and erode established mores, norms and written laws that are designed to dilute the fabric of our borders, culture and language. Poorly educated (dumbed-down) Americans, ‘slanted’ news from the mainstream media and press, subversive socialist oriented bureaucrats (SOBs) and Hollywood Nitwits all contribute to this process.
Not satisfied with the creeping socialism and erosion in freedoms being taken from us, ignorant adherents will occasionally promote the election of a liberal, socialist, presidential candidate. The Democrats presumptive candidate, B. Hussein Obama, is an attempt under the guise of needed “change” advocated by its leadership to leap ahead of the more methodical ACLU process.
Sponsorship of the Global Poverty Act, U.S. Senate Bill S.2433, is indicative of B. Hussein Obama’s deep-rooted socialist oriented bureaucrat (SOB) beliefs. Should this bill be approved by the senate and signed into law by a President Obama, it will purportedly indebt America to hand over $845 billon dollars to the United Nations. Begging this question: Will a President Obama also promote and sign into law a Slavery Reparations Act?
Unbeknownst, or through willful disregard the 86% of registered Democrats that consider themselves’ to be “politically moderate” and believe in God are being grossly mislead by their so-called leaders. Given lip service only today, Democrats were purportedly the party of the working class. Like all mature socialist organizations around the world, the elitists that now control the Democrat party are back to, effectively, trying to turn America’s sovereignty over to the United Nations. Preventing America from working to free itself from foreign oil, the Democrat controlled House of Representatives is participating in another ruse that could eventually give the U.N. more control of the U.S.
Pummeled day and night with liberal, socialist, demands for undefined “change,” America is just now starting to see and interpret the directions that an Obama White House could take us. Peering back at the Clinton Presidency and analyzing Obama’s lack of clarifications, one must conclude that the national “shake-downs” would be back in vogue and U.N adherence would be promoted. Rather than, for example, forcing science to prove that humans are causing global warming an Obama White House would, it appears, give the U.N. control of America’s entire carbon footprint.
Somehow, America survived a Carter administration that didn’t “think that a bunch of old religious men could be that big of a problem in control of Iran.” Applying this same mentality to an Obama Presidency, a reasonable person must conclude that when Mexico officially decides to annex the Southwest United States, he would cordially sit down and talk with their leaders.
Cutting through the bureaucratic-syntax, America needs less, not more, government controls, an energy program similar to the space program that created long term growth and jobs, and lower taxes. Finding and electing people that will support and follow through on these matters is the real issue.
John Ross
(Printer friendly version) Email: John A. Ross
