Enduring the RNC "Peaceful" Protests of the Uncivilized Far Left
By Rob Hood (09/06/08)
Every four years the political parties of this great land have their official convention to nominate and promote their candidate of choice for that political season. Of course, protests on both sides happen. That's normal. Protests have been around as long as humanity has been around. However, there are protests, and there are anarchists who pretend to be protesters.
At the Democratic National Convention there were a host of speakers who spoke well of Barack Obama and his plan for "change". Abortion and gay marriage was mention a few times, but with no specificity of any sort. That's okay. They have that right to free speech. Global warming was made aware several times, even though it is not manmade and 32,000 signatures of prominent scientists have made clear that fact. Nevertheless, that is irrelevant in this column.
What is relevant is the differences of the two opposing sides and their behavior. About 150 protesters were arrested at the Democratic convention. Most of them were anti-abortion protestors or anti-gay marriage protestors.
At the Republican National Convention, anarchy took place with far left violent and uncivilized scoundrels who intimidated and attacked delegates, smashed windows, vandalized cars, flattened tires, threw flaming garbage cans at policemen in riot gear, gave the finger to onlookers, and continued with their "peaceful" protests.
The anarchy of these uncivilized heathen just goes to show how violent and hypocritical the far left really is. These people on the extreme far left condemn conservatives for being "warmongers" and then turn around and become violent criminals themselves. 286 violent protesters were teargassed and arrested at the Republican convention. 130 of them face felony charges and get this - four of them are news reporters that represent that good ole unbiased media. One in particular was an Associated Press reporter. So much for unbiased news. I'll just bet this story won't make it onto the front pages!
Also there is another difference between our candidates. People say Barack Obama is not dangerous but some of his colleagues and associates are extremely dangerous individuals indeed. Rev. Wright was controversial in his thundering condemnation of God (took his name in Vain) and America in the house of God, but he is not dangerous.
People like Louis Farrakhan perhaps, could potentially be, but may not be. Mr. Farrakhan has the most anti-white and anti-American sentiment in this nation. His sermons and papers resemble those that might come from the mosques of Saudi Arabia and the like. However, he is not a real threat, but mostly just words. A man by the name of Bill Ayers, a former 1960s terrosist and advocate of anarchy is a confidant of Obama. See wikipedia for Ayers' full biography and his association with the Democratic Party. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Ayers
The real threat comes with the fact that Obama's campaign has been related on two separate occasions with HAMAS, and Palestinian terrorist organization. On one occasion the Obama campaign (with or without his consent) accepted a $25,000 donation from a group linked to members of HAMAS.
Next a man linked to HAMAS actually spoke at the Democratic Nation Convention. That man was Ingrid Mattson of the Islamic Society of North America - an organization with admitted ties to HAMAS and the Holy Land Foundation which claims to be a charitable outfit. Probably just a disguise like HAMAS's charitable excuse. Other Islamic ties have been mad as well. Iranian TV has been cheering for Obama and so have other Arabs in the Middle East. Now, it's getting interesting right?
I am not calling Obama a Muslim because I have no evidence of that, but from all accounts Islamic extremism has been on his side of the political fence. Perhaps Bush gave them such a blow that they now fear conservative Republicans? I doubt it. However, terrorists do understand that they have a better chance of prospering under a Democrat who will not seek them out and destroy them, but only ignore them.
Barack Obama promises to bring "change", but will that change come in the form of a great American dream or a Pro-Islamic nightmare? Do the research and decide for yourself. Now, that's something worth protesting!
RESOURCES:
Anti-War Protest at GOP Convention Turns Violent
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/01/anti-war-protest-at-gop-convention-turns-violent/
Nearly 300 arrested at RNC onvention protest
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26509509/
Leader of terrorist linked group speaks at Democratic convention
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/zieve/080826
Iranian TV goes for Obama
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=74340
Obama recieves endorsement form HAMAS, but media ignores it
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977345513
Obama' Iraq Policy Flawed
http://www.nopunditintended.com/categories/terrorism/
Obama recieves illegal funds from terrorist hotbed
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Election2008/Default.aspx?id=204974
Obama's illegal donations from GAZA
http://www.israelforum.com/blog_article.php?aid=1604511
OTHER RESOURCES WORTH LOOKING AT:
Why liberals fear and hate conservative women
http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2008/09/05/why_liberals_hate_and_fear_conservative_women
Obama Staes of America - 57 states and counting
http://obamastatesofamerica.com/
Palestinians gets Saddam charity checks
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/14/world/main543981.shtml
Saddam Hussein sent money to suicide bomber families
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,58871,00.html
HAMAS jealous over Saddam's links to Al Qaeda
http://www.scrappleface.com/?p=518
(Printer friendly version) Email: Rob Hood
