Phoenix, AZ Forecast

Analysis with Political and Social Commentary
About AB
Columnists CL
Donate DO
Editor Page ED
Front Page FP
Letters LT
Links LK
RSS Feed RS
Search SR
Submit ST
 
Inside Page Phoenix, AZ  By and for we the real people Copyright ©2005-2008 MoveOff, LLC
Cure Your Asthma In Just One Week   Brand New Mp3 Site!   Cure Anxiety & Panic Attacks   Stop Snoring Using Only Easy Exercises
Cure Your Heartburn   How A Fool Discovery Cured My Bad Breath   Natural Cancer Treatments   Cancer & Health-It's All About The Cell
Trading systems, methods and signals.   Natural Cure For Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
All-Natural Pain Relief And Cure For Arthritis Sufferers.   How To Lower Blood Pressure Without Drugs.


deluxe antivirus

How To Destroy America
"Government is not a solution to our problem[s],
government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan


It's Time to Worry about Global COOLING

"...an utterly corrupt new religion called environmentalism..."
If the history of this planet's climate over millions of years is any guide, we are about to enter a new ice age.

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper indicated in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune that he wants to see the United States become a Muslim country.
When City Planners Attack: The Assault On Private Property Rights
By Tony DiPasquale (03/17/04)

Nothing can be more gratifying than the feeling one gets when they purchase their first home. The excitement, the adrenaline, that flows through your veins the moments you can actually walk inside and look to your spouse and say, “it’s ours”. Well the Supreme Court of Connecticut is here to inform residents of their state that private property is not definite and no longer is private.

In an unfortunate, but all too foreseeable event, the justices of the Connecticut Supreme Court, those stalwarts of individual liberty, decided that eminent domain should not be limited to merely public use of the land, but should now be expanded to the furtherance of a city’s economic plan.

In Kelo v. City of New London, the plaintiffs were owners of various properties in the city of New London, an area that was targeted to be “revitalized” under a city development plan. 2002 WL 32372999 (Conn.) (soon to be recorded in the Atlantic reporter, second series) In conjunction with a city established development corporation, the plaintiffs were approached to sell their property in furtherance of this goal of rejuvenating the city. This proposal was underway because New London had recently experienced “serious employment declines”, much of which was attributable to the loss of 1900 government sector jobs. Id. at 4.

When the plaintiffs still refused to sell their properties, the government created development corporation, in October 2000, voted to use eminent domain to acquire the property from those refusing to sell. By November 2000, the development corporation began condemnation proceedings on those unwilling sellers.

It should be mentioned that the development corporation will own the area scheduled for development, but lease certain lands to private developers in order to carry out their plans. To add insult to injury, the court records state that one such developer, Corcoran Jennison, is in the midst of negotiations with the city on a ninety-nine year lease on three of the parcels for the staggering amount of $1 per year. Kelo at 3. In turn, the development corporation is forecasting the revitalization plan to create 518-867 construction jobs, 718-1362 direct jobs, and 500-940 indirect jobs, while producing between $680,544 - $1,249,843 in property taxes, all this despite 50% of the land area expected to be tax exempt. Id.

For matters of eminent domain, the Connecticut Supreme Court held in Kelo v. City of New London that economic development, including increased tax revenues, could be considered a valid public use. Kelo at 16. But the question should not be whether the benefit amount is adequate in relation to the taking. If we allow governments to take property away from its citizens on the basis of job growth or increased tax revenue, we all become susceptible to the arbitrary whims of those in power.

What becomes of the couple that has worked their entire life in order to enable themselves to retire to a quaint little house near the water? Are we to allow government to kick this couple out of their home because they refuse to sell to a developer who wishes to build magnificent structures that will have the effect of increased revenues to the municipality’s coffers? Should we allow the bureaucrat to deprive them of their home because he “knows best” what to do with their land? Does anyone, for a moment, believe that this is what our Founding Fathers had envisioned would be a taking for the public benefit?

Our Founding Fathers believed that the private ownership of property was an essential part of freedom. In fact, John Adams once commented, “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.” We have now shattered that concept in favor of one that allows government to be the stewards of what we do with our property. I wish I could be confident that the U.S. Supreme Court, if they should address the matter of eminent domain in the near future, would find the interpretation of public use, like the one put forth by the Connecticut Supreme Court, outrageous, and rectify the situation. However, based on past decisions on eminent domain, and their recent decisions concerning campaign finance reform, not to mention their willingness to cite international law, I cannot help but lack confidence that they will uphold any semblances of individual liberty. Instead, I fear we have just witnessed yet another assault on our precious liberties.

It is time for freedom-loving Americans everywhere to assert their rights by informing their representatives that our votes can no longer be taken for granted; that we will hold their feet to the fire. If not now, when?


(Printer friendly version)   Email: Tony DiPasquale

Tony DiPasquale is 32 years old and lives in Orlando, Florida, where he is attending Barry Law School. Self-employed in the construction industry, he recently earned a BS degree in political science from SUNY Brockport, where he graduated with a 3.75 GPA and was a member of both Alpha Chi and Pi Sigma Alpha. Presently, Tony's goals for political activity center in grassroots and lobbying.
Send Feedback To Tony DiPasquale    Site:



UPSSA

United Progressive Socialist States of America


DiscoverTheNetworks.Org : A Guide To The Political Left

*Ed: Views are those of individual authors and not necessarily those of American Daily.
"Mexico, Canada partnership underway with no authorization from Congress"

The United States Is Being Overthrown By Our Politicians - "A silent but all-reaching coup is taking place within the United States. This coup is not being directed by bomb-laden Muslim terrorists, nor will it ever be covered by the mainstream media. The seditious act is being carried out by our very own elected officials, with President Bush leading the insurrection."
"The FDA has conveniently used the excuse of looking out for consumer safety to increase their perverse regulatory power, undermine free speech, disrupt commerce, and generally get in the way of helping people improve their health. The "half-truth" of the safety issue is used as a ploy to reduce the rights of Americans, one freedom at a time. Once again, the FDA is seeking more police power to intimidate supplement companies. This is one step in an overall FDA master plan to eliminate therapeutic nutritional supplements from the free market. Those who lose are the American public." The FDA - A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing







  Entry Options   Newsletter   Suggested Subjects
Author Archives

 
May 2008: GreeenIsm
June 2008: FlyOverCountry
July 2008: EdukShun
August 2008: Open For Suggestions
September 2008: Illegal Immigration
Design © 2003-2008 American Daily. Content ©2003-2008 of its respective author.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
*Views are those of individual authors and not necessarily those of American Daily.
Powered by Nucleus CMS Copyright ©2005-2008 MoveOff,LLC

We use StatCounter
StatCounter