Phoenix, AZ Forecast

Analysis with Political and Social Commentary
About AB
Columnists CL
Donate DO
Editor Page ED
Front Page FP
Letters LT
Links LK
RSS Feed RS
Search SR
Submit ST
 
Inside Page Phoenix, AZ  By and for we the real people Copyright ©2005-2008 MoveOff, LLC
Cure Your Asthma In Just One Week   Brand New Mp3 Site!   Cure Anxiety & Panic Attacks   Stop Snoring Using Only Easy Exercises
Cure Your Heartburn   How A Fool Discovery Cured My Bad Breath   Natural Cancer Treatments   Cancer & Health-It's All About The Cell
Trading systems, methods and signals.   Natural Cure For Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
All-Natural Pain Relief And Cure For Arthritis Sufferers.   How To Lower Blood Pressure Without Drugs.


deluxe antivirus

How To Destroy America
"Government is not a solution to our problem[s],
government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan


It's Time to Worry about Global COOLING

"...an utterly corrupt new religion called environmentalism..."
If the history of this planet's climate over millions of years is any guide, we are about to enter a new ice age.

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper indicated in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune that he wants to see the United States become a Muslim country.
A Forgotten Tune
By La Shawn Barber (07/09/04)

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is like a long-forgotten song. Some of the words occasionally come to mind, and you might remember a few bars of the melody. But it fades away again, retreating to the recesses of your memory.

For all it’s worth in 2004, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (CRA) is probably obsolete. A high point of the Civil Rights movement, the CRA has become irrelevant, thanks to the existence of skin color preferences hiding behind “affirmative action.” Ambitious in purpose and far-reaching in scope, the CRA was not quite impressive enough for social engineers.

This month marks the 40th anniversary of the CRA, although it barely registered in the media, unlike the 50th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education. The legislation had its beginning in the post-Civil War amendments, which sought to protect the rights of newly-freed slaves. The 14th amendment was enacted to combat the “black codes”, laws designed to specifically limit the freedom of blacks; however, the rights of blacks were a low priority during the early part of the 20th century.

During the World War II era, civil rights enforcement picked up speed. By executive order in 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt outlawed discrimination in the nation’s military forces, federal employment and defense-related industries.

By 1954, legal segregation was dismantled, but the decision became a justification for unconstitutionally forced busing and racial bean counting in public schools. After the passage of the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1960, which didn’t go far enough, demands for comprehensive civil rights laws began to grow louder.

On June 11, 1963, President John F. Kennedy went on national television and asked Congress to consider drafting legislation dealing with racial discrimination in public accommodations, federally-assisted programs and other areas. Ironically, one hundred years earlier, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation.

President Kennedy, who didn’t live to see the bill’s passage, sought bipartisan support but failed to achieve it from the southern wing of the Democratic party. On February 10, 1964, the CRA passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 290-130. After a record two-month filibuster (in which Sen. Robert Byrd spoke 14 hours straight against the bill), a cloture vote ended the debate. Nine days later, the CRA passed the Senate 73-27. The bill was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964.

Because the drafters were concerned that the CRA might be misinterpreted to require or permit race preferences, Congress added this amendment: “Nothing contained in [Title VII] shall be interpreted to require any employer…to grant preferential treatment to any individual or to any group because of the race, color, religion sex or national origin of such individual or group.”

“Affirmative action” was benign in the beginning. The term was first used in a 1961 Executive Order by President Kennedy, which instructed federal contractors to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are treated equally “without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” President Johnson followed up with a similar order in 1965. Contractors were encouraged to cast a wider recruitment net to include more qualified minorities in the hiring pool.

But something went amiss. A Republican, President Richard M. Nixon, opened the door to racial quotas when he authorized the U.S. Department of Labor to set specific goals and timetables to correct the “underutilization” of blacks by federal contractors. Affirmative action became nothing more than a racial spoils system, undermining the very intent and purpose of the CRA and the constitutional ideals upon which it is based.

The real challenge is improving skills and providing equal opportunity—not outcome—for all, instead of taking the easy way out by setting different standards for different groups. As long as skin color preferences exist, the promise of the CRA is a song still unsung.

http://www.seattleu.edu/artsci/history/us1945/docs/cr64.htm
http://www.cs.umb.edu/jfklibrary/j061163.htm


(Printer friendly version)   Email: La Shawn Barber

La Shawn Barber's bi-weekly column also appears on TheRightReport.com. A freelance writer and former liberal, La Shawn is now a renegade supporter of conservative ideals.
Send Feedback To La Shawn Barber    Site: http://www.lashawnbarber.com



UPSSA

United Progressive Socialist States of America


DiscoverTheNetworks.Org : A Guide To The Political Left

*Ed: Views are those of individual authors and not necessarily those of American Daily.
"Mexico, Canada partnership underway with no authorization from Congress"

The United States Is Being Overthrown By Our Politicians - "A silent but all-reaching coup is taking place within the United States. This coup is not being directed by bomb-laden Muslim terrorists, nor will it ever be covered by the mainstream media. The seditious act is being carried out by our very own elected officials, with President Bush leading the insurrection."
"The FDA has conveniently used the excuse of looking out for consumer safety to increase their perverse regulatory power, undermine free speech, disrupt commerce, and generally get in the way of helping people improve their health. The "half-truth" of the safety issue is used as a ploy to reduce the rights of Americans, one freedom at a time. Once again, the FDA is seeking more police power to intimidate supplement companies. This is one step in an overall FDA master plan to eliminate therapeutic nutritional supplements from the free market. Those who lose are the American public." The FDA - A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing







  Entry Options   Newsletter   Suggested Subjects
Author Archives

 
May 2008: GreeenIsm
June 2008: FlyOverCountry
July 2008: EdukShun
August 2008: Open For Suggestions
September 2008: Illegal Immigration
Design © 2003-2008 American Daily. Content ©2003-2008 of its respective author.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
*Views are those of individual authors and not necessarily those of American Daily.
Powered by Nucleus CMS Copyright ©2005-2008 MoveOff,LLC

We use StatCounter
StatCounter