Why Jews And Blacks Should Vote For Bush, Part 1
By Irwin N. Graulich (10/18/04)
Attention Jews and Blacks! It's reality check time. Stop deluding yourselves and learn who your real friends are in the 21st century.
From Harlem to Boro Park, from New Rochelle to New Orleans, across America to the hood of Los Angeles and streets of Beverly Hills, both Jews and Blacks are going through cognitive dissidence. Inoculated at birth with a smallpox vaccine and Democrat party injection, the individuals who comprise these two groups have effectively prevented smallpox and the ability to vote Republican.
A shared history of persecution with early roots in slavery, inculcated a need for a strong liberal central government to take care of them. The Republican position has been independence from government and giving the individual more responsibility. Since dominant mothers played such a vital role in the Black/Jewish upbringing, both groups adopted a false need of "Big Mama" government security, cuddling up to politicians who promise to take care of them.
The Democratic party of 1960 has transformed itself into the Republican party of 2004, both moving ideologically leftward. John F. Kennedy's liberal values are now akin to conservative, from military strength to fiscal and personal responsibility. The problem is that these two overly loyal groups never changed with the times.
The Democratic party essentially kidnapped the term "liberal," making it into their newfound religion. Everyone knows just how difficult it is to convert out of a faith or belief system. Even though the foundations of this "Secular Religion" have changed radically over 40 years, it is extraordinarily difficult, if not impossible for millions of followers to convert to 21st century Republican liberalism, and cast a vote for George Bush.
The best friends of Jews and Blacks this election year are Republicans, not Democrats. Blacks are constantly being told by the Democratic party of all they did for civil rights. That was true in the 50's and 60's. Today, Democratic politicians parade blacks around like pets, showing how nice they are to them. It is Republican policies that are moving Black status upward.
For most Jews, the Democratic party platform has replaced their 3350 year old "Book" of moral principles. Democrats have done an excellent job at branding Republicans as a bunch of evil and greedy rich white men, which is why there was such a hatred for Clarence Thomas. A Democrat's worst nightmare is a Black or Jewish Republican. Once it is shown that white European males do not dominate the party's policies, the Democrats are toast.
John Kerry has adopted a concept straight out of the European playbook, where successful business people are told you "earned," no, you "took" too much from the societal pot and therefore it somehow came out of the pockets of those less fortunate. Therefore, you must give most of it back to the government. American values are more in line with the entrepreneurial idea that, "Wow. Bill Gates worked hard with a brilliant idea and deserves his rewards. In fact, maybe I can do it too."
It is John Kerry who has constantly tried to divide America through his mantra that "the wealthiest 2% got the tax break." Well, if that tiny group whom he calls "the rich" pay 80% of the taxes, of course their amount of savings will be larger. Most people who earn that "outrageous (sic)" amount of $200,000 or more, already pay over 50% of their earnings to the government. That means people work half a year for the government. How much more does Senator Kerry want from their pockets? After all, not everyone can marry a billionaire.
Jews and Blacks tend to take religion somewhat seriously, a la George W. Bush and yet the president has been criticized for getting his moral authority from the Bible. Is it better to vote for John Kerry who gets his moral direction from The New York Times? When will Jews accept the fact that the biggest supporters of Israel are religious American Christians, just like the president?
The constituencies who support Kerry and "hate Bush" should tell us something important--anarchists, the most radical leftist professors (where antisemitism/anti-Israel is a breeding ground), Hollywood actors and Michael Moore. The left continuously demonizes Republicans and conservatives because they realize that their rebuttal arguments are quite weak.
This has become an anti-Bush campaign because Senator Kerry has almost no serious congressional achievements. Therefore, it is Kerry's Viet Nam record which was the central theme of his acceptance speech at the convention.
Remember how intelligent you thought you had become at 19, but now realize just how foolish you truly were at the time. The large number of college students who have caught the "Beat Bush" fever shows us what can result from immature, overly compassionate, inexperienced thinking. As we grow, we learn that compassion is beautiful. However, we also must be able to maintain standards, without which, compassion can actually lead to evil.
John Kerry does not understand the uniqueness of America. He prefers coalitions and the UN. How about the idea that most of the world is wrong and we are right with regard to fighting evil. Right and wrong are not necessarily determined by majority vote. The senator believes we should ask the UN for their approvals, with votes cast by such despicable regimes as Iran, Syria, North Korea, Cuba, Sudan, et. al. George W. Bush would rather do the right thing, while John Kerry would prefer being hugged by Jacques Chirac.
Kerry-Bush represents the clash between European and American values. We all know what those European values did to Jews 65 years ago and what an overwhelmingly racially pure Europe meant for Blacks. European socialism, which John Kerry supports, says throw more money at the problems. George W. Bush says throw more education and values at the problems. The vote in 2004 is to stay American or become France.
Had Kerry been president, we would have had a peace treaty with Iraq and according to him, one would be in the works through unilateral negotiations with North Korea. We can all see Kerry waving the treaty announcing, "I had another talk with the Iraqi President, Herr Saddam. Here is the paper, that bears his signature along with mine." Now we have "peace in our time." On to Herr Kim Jong-il.
In 1992, when the choice was between Bill Clinton and George Bush Sr., the more capable candidate was clearly Clinton. However, Bush the father cannot hold a candle up to his son in any way. Bush Sr. was a rather incompetent president, while Bush Jr. is a thoroughly capable man with terrific values and the proper vision during difficult times. His leadership skills and existing record make him the obvious choice.
Which is why the Democratic platform was to disregard the rather poor record of their ultraliberal senator from Massachusetts. Their modus operandi was to label the president as more dangerous than Saddam, wanting to take checks away from senior citizens or even let them get sick because cheap drugs from Canada are not available. The rhetoric that the Republicans are dangerous and the president is evil has become all too common.
It is the exact same spin that the Islamic world has attempted with America and Israel. Keep up the big lie technique regarding just how bad our two nations are, until people eventually believe the propaganda. Jews must realize that they are not voting for Roosevelt this year and Blacks should understand that there is no relationship whatsoever between John Kerry and John Kennedy, except first names.
(Printer friendly version) Email: Irwin N. Graulich
