"...an utterly corrupt new religion called environmentalism..."
If the history of this planet's climate over millions of years is any guide, we are about to enter a new ice age.
CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper indicated in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune that he wants to see the United States become a Muslim country.
Phony Monday Morning Quarterbacks
By Michael P. Tremoglie (12/20/04)
Last week I wrote an article titled “Pentagon Incompetence or Bush Bashing?” It concerned the famous question to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld about armored vehicles in Iraq. The gist of my article was that the question was staged by a journalist trying to exploit a problem for his own gain.
As evidence, I cited a magazine article that answered this question some months earlier. My feeling is that if the journalist was really concerned about this he would have known the answer and either confirmed or refuted its validity. Instead, he chose to exploit the concerns of a soldier to do the work of liberals and Democrats and try to discredit Rumsfeld. Because of this I doubted the credibility of the journalist.
My article elicited a tsunami of vitriolic emails. They were full of righteous indignation. They were purportedly concerned for the welfare of military personnel.
However, corresponding with them soon revealed their true motive was their hatred of George Bush. Rumsfeld’s alleged incompetence was merely a proxy. Troop safety was a tertiary consideration. In fact, many gave me the impression that just a few weeks earlier they were probably calling troops baby killers.
Yet, some expressed legitimate questions, so more research was in order.
This research confirmed my initial belief. The full tape of the dialogue between Rumsfeld and the soldier on the radio, and the full transcript of the conversation confirmed it. What the mainstream media communicated is very different from the event.
This is the transcript of the dialogue between Specialist Wilson and Secretary Rumsfeld. What was broadcast and printed by the mainstream in bold font. The omitted portions of the colloquy are in normal font. Notice how the editing distorted what was said.
Specialist Wilson asked, “Yes, Mr. Secretary. My question is more logistical. We’ve had troops in Iraq for coming up on three years and we’ve always staged here out of Kuwait. Now why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromise ballistic glass to up-armor our vehicles and why don’t we have those resources readily available to us? [Applause]
Rumsfeld replied, "I talked to the General coming out here about the pace at which the vehicles are being armored. They have been brought from all over the world, wherever they’re not needed, to a place here where they are needed. I’m told that they are being – the Army is – I think it’s something like 400 a month are being done. And it’s essentially a matter of physics. It isn’t a matter of money. It isn’t a matter on the part of the Army of desire. It’s a matter of production and capability of doing it.
As you know, you go to war with the Army you have. They’re not the Army you might want or wish to have at a later time. Since the Iraq conflict began, the Army has been pressing ahead to produce the armor necessary at a rate that they believe – it’s a greatly expanded rate from what existed previously, but a rate that they believe is the rate that is all that can be accomplished at this moment.
I can assure you that General Schoomaker and the leadership in the Army and certainly General Whitcomb are sensitive to the fact that not every vehicle has the degree of armor that would be desirable for it to have, but that they’re working at it at a good clip. It’s interesting; I’ve talked a great deal about this with a team of people who’ve been working on it hard at the Pentagon. And if you think about it, you can have all the armor in the world on a tank and a tank can be blown up. And you can have an up-armored humvee and it can be blown up. And you can go down and, the vehicle, the goal we have is to have as many of those vehicles as is humanly possible with the appropriate level of armor available for the troops. And that is what the Army has been working on
And General Whitcomb, is there anything you’d want to add to that?
GEN. WHITCOMB: Nothing. [Laughter] Mr. Secretary, I’d be happy to. That is a focus on what we do here in Kuwait and what is done up in the theater, both in Iraq and also in Afghanistan. As the secretary has said, it’s not a matter of money or desire; it is a matter of the logistics of being able to produce it. The 699th, the team that we’ve got here in Kuwait has done [Cheers] a tremendous effort to take that steel that they have and cut it, prefab it and put it on vehicles. But there is nobody from the president on down that is not aware that this is a challenge for us and this is a desire for us to accomplish.
SEC. RUMSFELD: The other day, after there was a big threat alert in Washington, D.C. in connection with the elections, as I recall, I looked outside the Pentagon and there were six or eight up-armored humvees. They’re not there anymore. [Cheers] [Applause] They’re en route out here, I can assure you”
Not only were Rumsfeld’s remarks selectively edited for ideological reasons, subsequent news reports compound this distortion. Re-read the transcript and then read these comments by Newsweek reporters Michael Hirsh, John Barry and Babak Dehghanpisheh.
According to their December 20 article, “Rumsfeld's initial response was testy. ‘You go to war with the army you have,’ he barked.” Rumsfeld did not bark at all. This was intentionally characterized this way to impugn Rumsfeld's character." The misleading nature of the Newsweek article continues, “Two days after Rumsfeld's embarrassing exchange with Wilson, the Defense Department announced it was ordering 100 more up-armored Humvees a month from their main supplier, O'Gara-Hess & Eisenhardt in West Chester, Ohio. The Humvee armoring company …told reporters only a few days before that it was operating at 22 percent under capacity, but that there were no more orders from the Pentagon. Then suddenly there were more, for reasons the Army did not make clear. (The Pentagon claims it did not know about the additional capacity until the head of O'Gara's holding company, Armor Holdings of Jacksonville, Fla., announced last week that it was possible.)”
Once again, the media neglected to tell the whole truth. The Newsweek journalists conveniently omitted that Armor Holdings stated that they are unable to ramp production until at least February or March.[1]
However, on page two, Newsweek does attempt to provide balance. They wrote, ”this lack of armor was not some indication of supreme incompetence…. If anyone would have told me a Humvee would be the platform of choice in a war, I would have told them they're crazy," says Gary Motsek, director of support operations for Army Materiel Command. His view was echoed last week by former Army chief of staff Gen. Eric Shinseki, who told an audience at California's Pomona College that Humvees were never intended for combat. But Motsek says the Army has adjusted faster than many people realize. Last fall, he notes, when the Army realized the gravity of the insurgency, engineers at the Army Research Lab at Aberdeen, Md., designed the add-on armor kits for the Humvees "over a weekend."
Newsweek, at least, wanted to give the impression that they were not doing a hatchet job. Other media were not even trying to be objective.
NBC’s Chris Matthews and his panelists derided Bush during Matthews’ Sunday talk show. One panelist was the noted military expert, Katty Kay, the Washington DC correspondent for the BBC. Kay said unqualifiedly that the military, " absolutely" should have expected this insurgency.
I never realized Katty Kay had experience conducting military operations. I do realize, as a sports fan, that there is always a guy at the bar who knows how the coach should have called the game. These guys are known as Monday Morning Quarterbacks.
Sometimes Monday Morning Quarterbacks are correct and sometimes they are not. However, the fact is they are Monday morning. It is purely an opinion. They do not have to worry about the team.
It is easy to be a critic. Critics have the luxury of not having to experience the consequences of their choices. They have the luxury of not being responsible for the lives of other people. They have the luxury of not being responsible for the continuation of an enterprise.
This does not mean that criticism should not be considered. However, when such criticism is motivated by reasons other than the welfare of the person or persons involved, when it is not motivated by concern for the accomplishment of the objective, when it is motivated by purely selfish political reasons, then such criticism is unconscionable. The critics are unscrupulous.
My opinion of most of those who emailed me with their vituperative denunciations of Secretary Rumsfeld were being purely political. They were not concerned for the safety of the troops.
As far as the troops are concerned, let me refer you to comments (in bold font) I received from them. I cannot give you their names since I have not asked their permission.
First, an email from a friend of mine, a former Marine Sergeant, who served in Bosnia and Kosovo:
“The Marines do, in fact, have some armored Humvees, the early version were known as 'turtlebacks' (we used them in Kosovo) this wasn't planned for or thought about. Once the need developed, they have done everything they can to set it right. Lastly, there were no armored humvees to deliver! None, zero, nada. It's kinda (sic) hard to deliver something to the troops that the gummint (sic) hasn't made yet. Which leads into the other problem, the stupid gummint procurement system. ... FYI, in the interest of interservice rivalry, I haven't heard the Marines doing all this whining, unless I've missed it. Army guys, tho, are used to having all the latest and greatest toys... (This is why most Marines dislike the damn Army).
Another friend, a paratrooper, who saw action in Afghanistan and Iraq:
We didn't have enough armored HMMWVs in Afghanistan, therefore instead of griping about the system, we …fabricated our own and "made do" with the materials that we had...sandbags and all....just like our fathers did in Vietnam.
Finally, this quote from Major Mark Paget, the battalion executive officer of the 7th Transportation Battalion of who is currently stationed in theater and one responsible for the program of creatively modifying the vehicles. This was from an interview in Stars and Stripes. An interview that was available on the internet for anyone who wanted to find it. The italics are mine and were not included with the original article:
Maj. Mark Paget, the said there was no alternative when the battalion’s vehicles had to leave Kuwait and drive north last January...“We came up in soft skin vehicles. And we took hits,” he said. “We quickly realized we needed to do something fast...The battalion began a full-scale upgrade of every vehicle that would leave Anaconda, the supply heart of the mission....Paget said there is no one to blame for the lack of vehicles arriving in the theater, even 20 months after the war began....“We have a huge Army,” he said, and outfitting all of it will take time....Plus, the nature of warfare has changed, he said. His vehicles would normally be several miles behind the front lines, ferrying supplies to the front....In this war, he said, the front is everywhere. It simply takes time to adapt to the change....That’s why, he said, the 7th Transportation Battalion took the bull by the horns and addressed the problem its own way.
It is obvious that those who are directly involved with the Iraqi theater are not as acerbic as those who are not. This is why I question the motivation the critics. They have expressed their desire to be more concerned about politics than people before and they have done nothing to convince me they are not doing so now.
(Printer friendly version) Email: Michael P. Tremoglie
Michael P. Tremoglie is a freelance writer whose is completing his first novel, "A Sense of Duty," and an ex-Philadelphia cop.
Send Feedback To Michael P. Tremoglie
Site:
UPSSA
United Progressive Socialist States of America
|
"Mexico, Canada partnership underway with no authorization from Congress"
The United States Is Being Overthrown By Our Politicians - "A silent but all-reaching coup is taking place within the
United States. This coup is not being directed by bomb-laden Muslim terrorists, nor will it ever be covered by the mainstream media.
The seditious act is being carried out by our very own elected officials, with President Bush leading the insurrection."
"The FDA has conveniently used the excuse of looking out for consumer safety to increase their perverse regulatory power,
undermine free speech, disrupt commerce, and generally get in the way of helping people improve their health. The "half-truth" of
the safety issue is used as a ploy to reduce the rights of Americans, one freedom at a time. Once again, the FDA is seeking more
police power to intimidate supplement companies. This is one step in an overall FDA master plan to eliminate therapeutic nutritional
supplements from the free market. Those who lose are the American public." The FDA - A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
|
|
