"...an utterly corrupt new religion called environmentalism..."
If the history of this planet's climate over millions of years is any guide, we are about to enter a new ice age.
CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper indicated in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune that he wants to see the United States become a Muslim country.
Conservatives and the Constitution
By Trevor Bothwell (08/24/05)
Talk radio host Michael Graham has been fired from Washington, D.C.-based radio station WMAL-AM for his comment on July 21 that “Islam has, sadly, become a terrorist organization.” In the wake of this recent development, it’s becoming ever too clear that even conservatives sometimes misunderstand the Constitution.
Indeed, the first sentence of Graham’s formal statement regarding his release reads, “The First Amendment and I have been evicted from ABC Radio in Washington, DC.”
Well, he's half right. Mr. Graham may have been evicted from ABC Radio, but the First Amendment wasn’t even paying rent in the first place. As a private corporation, WMAL is under no obligation to observe it.
Most conservative columnists and bloggers are convinced that Graham was fired after WMAL buckled under pressure from the Council on American-Islamic Relations, and I tend to agree. According to Townhall.com writer Joel Mowbray:
The latest development in the month-long saga is surprising given that there was barely a stir for the first few days after Graham’s original remarks—and he wasn’t suspended until a week later, on July 28. Once he was suspended—which happened as a result of a CAIR-led campaign—the group instigated a campaign to have him fired.
That said, blogger Brian Maloney admitted recently that hunting down the real reasons Mr. Graham was fired is proving to be somewhat tricky. “Was he really terminated after a pressure campaign led by Islamic extremists?” Maloney asks. “Did his comments cross the line?”
Chances are Disney-owned WMAL is the only entity that truly knows why Michael Graham was fired. But the point is, it doesn’t really matter why he was. Conservatives can be upset. CAIR can be happy. It matters not. WMAL should be able to hire or fire any of its employees for any reason. It’s their company, their business, and their prerogative. And it’s also their responsibility to suffer the consequences if they go bankrupt because of their decisions.
This is where those who dispute WMAL’s decision come in. Write the station, buy ad space in newspapers criticizing ABC Radio’s judgment, or simply change the tuner. Let WMAL’s executives know that if they want your business they had better employ talk show hosts who represent your views in the marketplace of ideas. But don’t do what Michael Graham and a website supporting him have done by making statements in the vein of “CAIR WINS, FREE SPEECH LOSES AT ABC RADIO.”
This is not the first time conservatives have misapplied the Constitution either. In early August Wayne LaPierre, Executive Vice President of the National Rifle Association, improperly invoked the Second Amendment as he announced a nationwide boycott of energy and oil conglomerate ConocoPhillips.
Reacting to a federal lawsuit filed by ConocoPhillips to block an Oklahoma law preventing companies from firing employees for keeping legally owned firearms in cars parked in company parking lots, LaPierre stated, “[W]e’re going to make ConocoPhillips the example of what happens when a corporation takes away your Second Amendment rights.”
As a member of the NRA, I support its campaign to encourage corporations to allow employees the benefits of firearm protection on company property. But Mr. LaPierre nonetheless should have known better than to suggest that a private corporation has any duty whatsoever to uphold our right to bear arms.
Such misunderstanding of private property rights does not help the conservative movement. The fact that WMAL may be run by a bunch of pusillanimous imps who caved to CAIR's pressure is certainly pathetic, but it's not unconstitutional. Likewise, ConocoPhillips has as much right to prevent the possession of firearms on its property as you do in your own house.
The Bill of Rights is not a contract between two citizens. It’s a contract between government and its citizens. It places limits on the government, not the people. If we fail to realize this, how long can we expect the government to protect private property rights if we carelessly disregard them when it comes to those with whom we simply disagree?
©2005 Trevor Bothwell
Based on this blog
(Printer friendly version) Email: Trevor Bothwell
Trevor Bothwell is a freelance writer living in Maryland. He is a contributing writer at Democracy Project (www.democracy-project.com). He is a graduate of the State University of New York (SUNY) at Geneseo. He holds a bachelor's degree in elementary education and a master's degree in reading education, both from Geneseo. Trevor released his first book in December 2001, a cookbook titled "50 Ways to Impress Your Girlfriend's Parents" (Silver Hammer Press). Trevor currently spends his spare time promoting his book and cooking way too often for his wife, Amie. They live in southern Maryland.
Send Feedback To Trevor Bothwell
Site:
UPSSA
United Progressive Socialist States of America
|
"Mexico, Canada partnership underway with no authorization from Congress"
The United States Is Being Overthrown By Our Politicians - "A silent but all-reaching coup is taking place within the
United States. This coup is not being directed by bomb-laden Muslim terrorists, nor will it ever be covered by the mainstream media.
The seditious act is being carried out by our very own elected officials, with President Bush leading the insurrection."
"The FDA has conveniently used the excuse of looking out for consumer safety to increase their perverse regulatory power,
undermine free speech, disrupt commerce, and generally get in the way of helping people improve their health. The "half-truth" of
the safety issue is used as a ploy to reduce the rights of Americans, one freedom at a time. Once again, the FDA is seeking more
police power to intimidate supplement companies. This is one step in an overall FDA master plan to eliminate therapeutic nutritional
supplements from the free market. Those who lose are the American public." The FDA - A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
|
|
