"...an utterly corrupt new religion called environmentalism..."
If the history of this planet's climate over millions of years is any guide, we are about to enter a new ice age.
CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper indicated in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune that he wants to see the United States become a Muslim country.
What Do Americans think of Democratic Peace?
By R J Rummel (10/06/05)
The isolationists libertarian website LewRockwell.com has reported on an important survey, "Public Skeptical About Bush's Democracy Crusade" (here). Colleague comments on it below:
Regarding the survey on promoting democracy, one interesting finding was the fairly straightforward view (point 1) that most Americans don't favor "promoting democracy with military force" -- of course not! Americans are so imbued with the democratic culture of bargaining, negotiating, and compromise, that reverting to the use of force for almost any purpose except clear self-defense is anathema.
This meshes with the view that going to war wasn't a good enough reason to do the Iraq war (point 2) -- but then who said that was the main reason? This is a skewed question!
A disturbing finding (point 3) was that although a very large majority feels that democracy is the best form of government, there is less confidence (only 50%) that it is best for all countries. This does seem to mesh with the finding (point 8) that Americans don't think the US democracy is perfect . . . . I wish the survey had asked "If you don't believe that democracy is the best form of government for any particular country, what form of government DO you feel is best for that country. . . and why?"
Also as part of point 3, note that although most feel democracy is the best form of government, "Americans are not convinced [only 26% agreed] that when there are more democracies the world is a safer place. . . . or whether democracies are less likely to go to war with each other [only 46% agreed] . . . . " Interestingly, and what makes this survey particularly useful in the democratic peace research program is that the survey actually identified the democratic peace (no war between democracies), rather than the usual "democracies don't fight."
Here is where the most disturbing finding is found (page 5 of the survey): "The view, popular among political scientists, that democracies are unlikely to go to war with each other does not have a wide following. A plurality (49%) said democracies are just as likely to go to war with each other as are other types of governments, compared to 46% who said democracies are less likely to go to war with each other than other types of governments. However, 55% of Republicans agreed that democracies are less likely to go to war."
A quick note on the last sentence: I ASSUME they meant that the 55% of Republicans agreed that democracies were less likely to GO TO WAR WITH EACH OTHER. . . . but the text says simply "less likely to go to war" which significantly would change the meaning of the question.
In one sense, it is remarkable that 46% actually DO believe the democratic peace proposition -- even though I suspect that the vast majority of all respondents are NOT familiar with any of the democratic peace literature or rationale -- rather, they might have heard just the proposition itself. How much higher would this percent be IF all the respondents were given a 10-minute primer on WHY democracies don't fight each other?
Anyway, despite the discouraging basic finding (Americans are skeptical about promoting democracy), there is a great mix of hope and despair here. The despair is that most Americans don't really understand democracy that well. The hope is that most think it is the best form of government. And finally, there is some despair that much work needs to be done to explain democracy and the democratic peace. . . . but for those of us who teach, that is precisely a matter of great hope!
Okay folks, when there is the whole field of quantitative international relations which agree that democracies either don't make war on each other or virtually never do, while the public at large is split on this, clearly we have a lot of communicating to do. First, we must remove this question from politics, and show that it is a social scientific matter. Second, we have to convince the idea gatekeepers, the major media's columnists, commentators, and reporters about this. And third, we must use our blogs and website to spread the word.
Original Blog
(Printer friendly version) Email: R J Rummel
R.J. Rummel is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science. He has published twenty-four nonfiction books (one that received an award for being among the most referenced), four novels, and about 100 peer-reviewed professional articles; has received the Susan Strange Award of the International Studies Association in 1999 for having intellectually most challenged the field; and in 2003 was awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Conflict Processes Section, American Political Science Association. He was a 1996 Nobel Peace Prize finalist.
Send Feedback To R J Rummel
Site: http://www.freedomist.net/
UPSSA
United Progressive Socialist States of America
|
"Mexico, Canada partnership underway with no authorization from Congress"
The United States Is Being Overthrown By Our Politicians - "A silent but all-reaching coup is taking place within the
United States. This coup is not being directed by bomb-laden Muslim terrorists, nor will it ever be covered by the mainstream media.
The seditious act is being carried out by our very own elected officials, with President Bush leading the insurrection."
"The FDA has conveniently used the excuse of looking out for consumer safety to increase their perverse regulatory power,
undermine free speech, disrupt commerce, and generally get in the way of helping people improve their health. The "half-truth" of
the safety issue is used as a ploy to reduce the rights of Americans, one freedom at a time. Once again, the FDA is seeking more
police power to intimidate supplement companies. This is one step in an overall FDA master plan to eliminate therapeutic nutritional
supplements from the free market. Those who lose are the American public." The FDA - A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
|
|